Backdrop & Context: From Free Trade toFortress Economies
Once heralded as a pillar of globalisation and efficiency,international trade is now caught in the crossfire of geopolitics and nationalinterests. At the recent IMF spring gathering, Kristalina Georgieva articulatedthis transformation, warning, “In a multi-polar world, where things are mademay matter more than how much they cost.” Her remarks reflect a starkrecalibration of economic priorities: cost-effectiveness is being overshadowedby concerns over supply chain resilience, industrial self-sufficiency, andgeopolitical risk.
This evolving trade philosophy is especially evident insectors such as steel, a backbone industry linked to both infrastructure anddefense. The IMF says governments are now prepared to subsidize and protectdomestic steel production, even at the expense of global competitiveness andeconomic efficiency.
Who’s Involved? A Confluence of Countries &Crises
The United States, European Union, China, India, and Japanare among the nations reshaping industrial policy to promote homegrownmanufacturing in strategic sectors. In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Actand bipartisan infrastructure laws have poured billions of dollars intodomestic manufacturing and raw material processing, including steel. In Europe,leaders are prioritizing energy security and defense readiness, boosting demandfor domestically produced metals.
Georgieva noted, “The logic of national security saysthat a broad range of strategic goods, from computer chips to steel, must bemade at home, and that this is worth paying for.” Her comments come just asJapan reported a 4.5% drop in crude steel output in FY 2024/25, partly due toglobal oversupply from China and rising trade barriers.
Trade Tensions: Trust Fractures & ShipsAdrift
Trust, the IMF warns, has become the most expensivecasualty of the new world order. “Global trade tensions are boiling over,”Georgieva said, underscoring the breakdown in diplomatic and commercialrelationships among major economies. She painted a vivid picture: “Ships atsea not knowing which port to sail to; investment decisions postponed;financial markets volatile; precautionary savings up.”
According to the IMF, this uncertainty creates cascadinginefficiencies: capital sits idle, consumers pay more, and manufacturersstruggle to secure affordable inputs. When tariffs are applied to raw materialslike steel, the knock-on effects are felt across automotive, construction,defense, and renewable energy sectors.
The Productivity Penalty of Protectionism
While national security may justify localizedmanufacturing, the IMF cautions that this strategy has long-term economicdownsides. “Protectionism erodes productivity,” Georgieva emphasized. “Importedinputs feed into a broad range of domestic products. The cost of one item canbe affected by tariffs in dozens of countries.”
She further warned that governments' desire to preservestrategic autonomy can lead to stagnation if domestic firms face reducedcompetitive pressure. In industries like steel, where innovation and economiesof scale are critical, the lack of global competition could dampen incentivesto modernize or reduce emissions.
Steel, Subsidies & Supply Chains: ANationalist Playbook
Japan’s Iron and Steel Federation recently highlighted thechallenges of operating in a climate of overcapacity and weak export demand. “Steeldemand was dampened by construction delays caused by labour shortages and highmaterial costs, as well as a sluggish recovery in production within theautomobile and other manufacturing sectors,” said a federation analyst. Therecent U.S. steel tariffs, 25% on imports and new auto part duties, furthercomplicate Japan’s prospects.
Nippon Steel has shuttered a blast furnace, and JFE Steelwill suspend one in May, reflecting what Tadashi Imai, Chairman of thefederation, warned could push Japan’s crude steel production below 80 millionmetric tons annually. “The U.S. tariffs on steel and automobiles couldreduce our national output by several million tons,” Imai stated lastmonth.
Europe’s Response: Strategic Spending &Single Market Unity
Georgieva pointed to Germany’s increased defense andinfrastructure spending as a model response, saying it will lift domesticdemand and create buffers against global turbulence. She called for EU-widepolicies to improve competitiveness through greater market integration andfiscal flexibility.
“EU fiscal easing and stronger integrationwould lift growth, increase resilience, and improve both internal and externalbalances,” she explained. Deepening the single market, by harmonizingregulations, investing in green technologies, and easing cross-borderbusiness—could reduce Europe’s exposure to external shocks while supportingstrategic autonomy.
Forecasts: Growth Downgrades, Inflation MarkupsAhead
The IMF’s World Economic Outlook, due later thisweek, will reflect the cost of these transformations. Though a global recessionisn’t anticipated, Georgieva confirmed there will be “notable markdowns”in growth forecasts. Meanwhile, inflation forecasts are being revised upwardsin several economies due to persistent supply disruptions and elevated inputcosts.
“The longer uncertainty persists, the largerthe cost,” she concluded. The IMF believes policymakers must strike adelicate balance, preserving strategic industries like steel without cripplingtrade flows or innovation.
Key Takeaways:
