In a landmark ruling, a Philippine court has mandated the country’s corporate regulator to reinstate the operating license of Rappler, a prominent news website co-founded by Nobel laureate Maria Ressa. This decision comes after years of legal challenges and government harassment under the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte. The Court of Appeals, in a ruling dated July 23 but released to the public on August 9, overturned the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission's earlier decision to shut down Rappler, marking a significant moment for press freedom in the Philippines.
The SEC had initially revoked Rappler's license in 2018, citing violations of foreign equity restrictions in media ownership. The issue arose from a 2015 investment by the Omidyar Network, founded by eBay's Pierre Omidyar, which involved selling depositary receipts to a foreign entity. The SEC's decision was upheld in 2022, just days before Duterte left office, creating a precarious situation for the news organization. However, the appellate court found that the SEC had acted with “grave abuse of discretion” in its actions against Rappler, deeming the shutdown order illegal.
Maria Ressa expressed relief and gratitude following the court's decision, describing it as a crucial victory for journalism in the face of adversity. Rappler's statement highlighted that this ruling serves as a reminder that the mission of journalism is vital, even when under threat. The news site emphasized its commitment to holding power accountable and fostering a better society, reflecting the resilience of independent media in challenging environments.
Despite the SEC's attempts to shut down Rappler, the organization continued to operate and report news while appealing the decision. This perseverance illustrates the dedication of Ressa and her team to uphold journalistic standards and provide reliable information to the public. The recent ruling represents not only a victory for Rappler but also for other media outlets facing similar challenges in the Philippines and beyond.
The case underscores the broader context of press freedom in the Philippines, where journalists often face intimidation and legal obstacles. Ressa herself has been a vocal critic of the Duterte administration, which has been accused of stifling dissent and undermining democratic institutions. Her legal battles have drawn international attention, highlighting the risks faced by journalists in authoritarian regimes.
The restoration of Rappler's license is seen as a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for press freedom in the Philippines. It serves as an encouraging sign for other media organizations operating in hostile environments, reinforcing the idea that the fight for truth and accountability can prevail against oppressive forces. As Rappler moves forward, it remains committed to its mission of delivering accurate news and holding those in power accountable.
This ruling not only marks a significant victory for Rappler but also raises important questions about the future of media regulation and foreign investment in the Philippines. The implications of this case may resonate beyond the country, influencing discussions on press freedom and the role of independent journalism in democratic societies.
